American Indian Nations
American Indian Nations
 


Home
Our Unique Heritage
Our Strategic Vision
Academic Programs
Partnerships with Tribes
Events and ConferencesDiscussions and Debates
About Us
Subscribe/Contribute
References and Resources
News
Contact

 

American Indian Views of Andrew Jackson and/or His Removal Policy

 

Petition of Cherokee Women (1818)

“ Beloved Children, We have called a meeting among ourselves to consult on the different points now before the council, relating to our national affairs. We have heard with painful feelings that the bounds of the land we now possess are to be drawn into very narrow limits. The land was given to us by the Great Spirit above as our common right, to raise our children upon, & to make support for our rising generations. We therefore humbly petition our beloved children, the head men & warriors, to hold out to the last in support of our common rights, as the Cherokee nation have been the first settlers of this land; we therefore claim the right of the soil. …” (Andrew Jackson Presidential Papers microfilm, Washington, 1961, series 1, reel 22, cited in The Cherokee Removal: A Brief History with Documents, ed. Theda Perdue and Michael Green, 1995, 125).

 

Pushmataha (1820)

After Andrew Jackson asked the Choctaw to cede a “small slip of your land here” (nearly half, over five million fertile acres, of their remaining land in the Southeast) in exchange for thirteen million acres west of the Mississippi, Choctaw speaker Pushmataha replied that the “little slip of land” “is a very considerable tract of country” whereas the land in the west, which Jackson had described as full of “many water courses, rich lands and high grass abounding in game of all kinds … honey and fruits of many kinds” is actually “poor and sterile, tractless, sandy deserts, nude of vegetation of any kind. … the grass is very short … and for the game it is not plenty, except buffalo and deer. … There are but few beavers, and the honey and fruit are rare things. … The rivers are … liable to inundation during the spring season, and in summers the rivers and creeks dry up or become so salty that the water is awful for use” (Robert Remini, Indian Wars, 201-202).

 

Nancy Reece (1828)

“… I do not think that all the people are friends to the Cherokees. Miss. Ames has been reading a part of the Presid. Message. Perhaps he does not like the laws of the Indian tribes for he says ‘This state of things requires that a remedy should be provided.’ Miss. Ames has been talking to the scholars and she felt bad and told them that they must get a good education soon as the can, so they can teach if they should be removed where they could not attend school. … I have been talking to the children about it and one says ‘if the white people want more land let them go back to the country they came from’ another says ‘they have got more land than they use, what do they want to get ours for’ (John Howard Payne/Daniel Butrick Papers, Newberry Library, Chicago, III.; cited in Perdue and Green, eds., 48).

 

Chickasaw Chiefs (1830)

“ Father, we the Chickasaws have occupied the country not only where we now live from time immemorial but a large portion of the rich and fertile lands of Tennessee and Alabama. … We have from time to time sold piece after piece of our country to our white brothers … until we have but a small home left that is barely sufficient to subsist upon while living and to bury our bones when we are dead. … Father, you call us your children, but … we cannot consent to exchange the country where we now live for the one we have never seen” (Coberts et al. to Andrew Jackson, August 25, 1830, Record Group 75, Office of Indian Affairs; cited in Robert Remini, Indian Wars, 244).

 

Petition of Cherokee Women (1831)

“ We the females, residing in Salequoree and Pine Log … believe the present plan of the General Government to effect our removal West of the Mississippi, and thus obtain our lands for the use of the State of Georgia, to be highly oppressive, cruel and unjust. And we sincerely hope there is no consideration which can induce our citizens to forsake the land of our fathers of which they have been in possession from time immemorial, and thus compel us, against our will, to undergo the toils and difficulties of removing with our helpless families hundreds of miles to unhealthy and unproductive country” (Cherokee Phoenix, November 12, 1831; cited in Perdue and Green, 126).

 

Levi Colbert (1832)

“ As the head of my Nation, my heart tells me it is right that I place truth before you and if you have looked me in the face and dealt with my heart often and long enough, to credit my words, you shall have truth in its nakedness. I had not lived and cast my senses, as you know, along the whitemans march, with my eyes shut, man proves the hand of God can no more change principles fixed in him, than he can change his skin, so it is, with the Indian, and his native land, when he hears of a departure from it, his heart like the stricken deer, reels and falls, but he may not die. I saw the whitemans march was to take my country. I prepared my mind and the mind of my Nation for it. … The Chickasaw feel a native born attachment for their Country and it seems to me true, that nature presents nothing in the west, which can make the Chickasaws more happy there -- than here, their Native and beloved land. It is true that my Nation become willing to sell their Country, to put down that bitter question of State Sovereignty, to keep peace in the white family, to preserve the Union of the United States whose friendship and protection we want, and our selves, to get away from the troubles which our white brothers fixed upon us. It is the result of our weakness and we surrender our Country to cure the evils we never created” (Letter of Principal chief of the Chickasaw to Andrew Jackson, Nov. 22, 1832 http://www.flash.net/~kma/CHICL_32.htm).

 

William Shorey Coodey (1840)

“ The entire Cherokee population were captured by the U.S. troops under General Scott in 1838 and marched [and] … encamped in large bodies until the time for their final removal west. … At length the word was given to ‘move on’ … At this very moment a low sound of distant thunder fell on my ear. In almost an exact western direction a dark spiral cloud was rising above the horizon and sent forth a murmur. I almost fancied a voice of Divine indignation for the wrongs of my poor and unhappy countrymen, driven by brutal power from all they loved and cherished in the land of their fathers, to gratify the cravings of avarice. The sun was unclouded—no rain fell—the thunder rolled away and sounds hushed in the distance. …” (From a letter to John Howard Payne, Payne/Butrick Mss. Vol. VI, Ayer collection, Newberry Library, Chicago, IL).

 

Sarah Vowell (1998) [Sarah Vowell and her sister Amy took a road trip retracing the Trail of Tears their ancestors traveled]

“… [In] Worcester v. Georgia … the [Supreme] Court under Chief Justice John Marshall ruled the Cherokee Nation was just that, a sovereign nation within the borders of the U.S. and therefore beholding only to the federal government, i.e., not under the jurisdiction of Georgia state laws. [President Andrew Jackson who was pro-removal … decided he wasn’t going to back the Supreme Court ruling.] On hearing of the ruling, the President is said to have replied, ‘John Marshall has made his ruling, now let him enforce it.’ Think about that—what that means, a breakdown of the balance of power in such boasting dictatorial terms. Jackson is violating his own oath of office, to uphold the Constitution. In the 20th century when people bandy about the idea of impeachment for presidents who fib about extramarital dalliances, it’s worth remembering what a truly impeachable offence looks like. Didn’t happen of course, I refer you to the face on the $20 bill” (Sarah Vowell, “Trail of Tears, ” Episode 107, This American Life, July 3, 1998 http://www.thislife.org/pages/descriptions/98/107.html).

 

More of Sarah Vowell’s views

Most Americans have had this experience. Most of us can name things our country has done that we find shameful, from the travesties that everyone agrees were wrong, the Japanese internment camps or the late date of slavery’s abolition, to murkier partisan arguments … World history has been a bloody business from the get go, but the nausea we’re suffering standing on the broken promises [to the Cherokee] at Ross’ Landing [in Chattanooga, TN] is peculiar to a democracy. Because in a democracy, we’re all responsible for everything our government does … Meanwhile there are little kids literally walking over these words, playing on them, making noise, having fun. I sort of hate them for a second. We ask a teacher who’s with a group of fourth graders why she isn’t talking to them about Cherokee history and she says normally she would but it’s the end of the school year and this trip is their reward for being good. Sounds reasonable. I ask Amy if she thinks these kids should share our sadness. “Well, I think it’s a sad story. It’s … sort of like the Holocaust. You don’t have to be Jewish to think that’s a sad part of history and I think the trail of Tears is … America’s version of genocide … it started right over there.” Still … I envy those children … I want to join them. I’m an IMAX person … I feel really haunted by this … I feel very weighed down by the pain. … The more I learn [about the Trail of Tears/Cherokee History] the worse I feel and the more hatred I feel toward this country that I still love. Therefore the more conflicted. … In the trail of Tears Saga, if there’s one person you’re allowed to hate, it’s Andrew Jackson, the architect of the Indian removal policy. … The person I most empathize with in this history is John Ross, the principal chief during the Trail of Tears, because he was caught between the two nations. He believed in the possibilities of the American constitution enough to make sure the Cherokee had one too. He believed in the liberties the Declaration of Independence promises and the civil rights the Constitution ensures. And when the U.S. betrayed not only the Cherokee, but its own creed, I would guess John Ross was not only angry, not only outraged, not only confused, I would guess John Ross was a little broken hearted. Cause that’s how I feel. I’ve been experiencing the Trail of Tears not as a Cherokee but as an American (Sarah Vowell, “Trail of Tears,” Episode 107, This American Life, July 3, 1998 http://www.thislife.org/pages/descriptions/98/107.html).

 

Read more on "Should Andrew Jackson be Removed from the $20 Bill?"